My Favourites for 2013

Around this time of year, we start getting all the top films, best films, and perhaps favourite film lists. There is a difference between what they mean, because I believe most of these lists list the best made films, which are usually the critical darlings. That's not to say a critical darling can't also be a favourite, but, for my list, these favourites may have been critically savaged. For some reason or another, I just enjoyed these films the most.

I keep a record of what I see at the cinema each year, but not what I watch at home. Well, the home viewing is actually recorded on the facebook page here, but, I wasn't doing it all year, so I won't include those films in my favourites for 2013 list. So, out of the 37 films I saw at the cinemas this year, these are my top picks. I'm still picking 10 films, even though the overall list is low. Something tells me I could change a few of these if I was to re-do the list in a few weeks. But, this is it for now. Enjoy!

In no particular order either.

This was a really fun film. Very witty scripting, and an effective mystery thriller. I look forward to seeing Tom Cruise continue in the role in a potential sequel that was recently announced. And no, I have not read any of the books yet, so I don't have any issues with Tom Cruise in the role. Although I don't think Christopher McQuarrie is a great director, I am keen to see what he and Tom cook up for Mission Impossible 5.

I read the book just before seeing the film, and it was amazingly adapted. Such beautiful cinematography and excellent computer effects. The mix between real tiger and cgi is practically flawless. A great story of courage and strength under, well, quite tense circumstances. How would you go in a boat full of wild animals? Ang Lee did a great job here. 

Again, another book I read before seeing the film. The book was the toughest read I've had, not that I have read a lot. But, it is just not straight forward at all. The film isn't either, but, it is fantastically re-created on screen by the great Wachowski's (Matrix Trilogy). The performances of the entire cast in different roles is excellent. This is grand story telling. 

 A critical darling from early in the year, this is a very well made drama comedy. Jennifer Lawrence bagged her Oscar for this role, and she just keeps getting better and better. Her and Cooper work well together as the 'slightly off mentally' strangers that fall in love. Not your typical love story I suppose. 

Well, this film was not very well received. In fact, it probably is not as good as the first, but man, did I really have a lot of fun watching it. It is the cast that makes this film. They work so well with other. The story, well, I thought it was perfectly entertaining, and don't have any of the fanboy or Trekkie angst that others have with how the main villain was handled.

My most anticipated film of the year. Wow, I was giddy as hell going into this. And, it didn't disappoint. It is epic stuff. Sure, a lot of the complaints are how it messed with the traditional story we know of Superman. But, why not change it up a bit. We've had plenty of the traditional Superman before (5 films?), so, I think the change is welcome. Russell Crowe and Kevin Costner in the one film, sign me up for sure. Henry Cavill was great as Clark/Kal-El. It's not perfect, but, it was great reboot. I really do wonder how they will fit Batman into this world though.

This was, for me, the perfect blend of love and laughter. The time travel aspect only added more fun to the mix - and I do love a time travel film. The feel good movie of the year.

What an adrenalin charged film. A fantastic recreation of the 70's world of F1, with some very effective racing sequences. The two main stars were brilliant. I love cars, and this was great fun. 

What a dark film this was. Just the shittiest of situations for any parent - what would you do if your child went missing. Hugh Jackman takes his Wolverine and amps it up by 10. It would be a crime if he doesn't win the Oscar for this.

The closest most of us will get to knowing what it is like in Space. This is a marvel of a production. A very taunt film, I had sweaty palms on many occasions during this movie. Beautifully filmed. 

 

American Hustle Review (No Spoilers)

Well, we're getting into awards season (Golden Globes and Oscars plus various others), so we're starting to get a few more dramas and overall award bait films coming through. I don't get to catch them all at the cinema, but I try to when I can. American Hustle is one such film. Director David O. Russell last gave us the excellent Silver Linings Playbook. He has cast two of his stars in that film to be part of this ensemble crime/drama/comedy with satisfying results. 

We've got Bale, Adams, Cooper and Lawrence firing on all cylinders here. Christian Bale really could be the most dedicated actor in the game. He'll thin down to sickening levels for some roles, beef up to play The Dark Knight, and then pile it on to play a fat hustler. It helps that he is also a great actor. He nails his performance here, as per usual. He's kind of the anti-hero in this film - a bad guy, but a good one too. Amy Adams is sultry as fuck in this. Oh my god, those cleavage baring outfits were heaven sent - oh, and her acting chops are top class as well. Cooper is probably the least talented of the bunch, but he's still quite good - he is certainly developing as an actor in some quite meaty roles. In fact, the intensity and chemistry between Cooper and Adams in some scenes was electric.  Jennifer Lawrence, well, what can I say, she is a showstopper. Such talent from a young actress. And man, does she play a bitch in this.

Cooper plays an FBI agent wanting to nail a supposedly shady politician, and essentially blackmails Bale and Adams into helping pull off a con (hustle). There are some hilarious moments, real gritty dramatic ones, and a highly enjoyable tone throughout the whole film. The 70's setting is well done, with a soundtrack that is just so catchy - I want that tracklisting. 

Overall, this is satisfying cinema, with a cast and story that is very engaging and occasionally quite tense. Probably not as good as Silver Linings for me, but still well worth it. 

Rating:

4 out of 5.

Ender's Game Review (No Spoilers)

It's been a while since my last post. A combination of busy weeks and laziness is to blame. There is never really anything not to write about, it's just about gettiing around to pouring my thoughts out onto the keyboard. But remember, I do publish shorter rewiews on facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/TooMuchToWatch

A couple of weeks ago I checked out Ender's Game. I love sci fi, in any form really - I also love that dystopian future we occasionally get to see in films. Following on from Oblivion earlier this year, this is another pretty cool take on the genre. However, this movie is based on a popular novel from the mid 80's by author Orson Scott Card. I know nothing about this book or the author, so won't even comment on that work or recent news stories about him. The film follows kids, around early to mid teen, that are in training to fight our new enemy - an ant-like alien species known as the Formics. The Formics almost wiped us out, and now, we have gathered these elite youngsters to be our last hope against annihilation. 

The cast is led by Asa Butterfield as Ender Wiggin - weird name. He does a stellar job as the chosen one - the one to lead the army of young soldiers into battle. This film is not your typical kids film - it has a darker edge to it. Asa is supported well by the likes of Harrison Ford, Viola Davis and Ben Kingsley. Although, I did find it weird that Ben Kingsley plays a Maori, even with a solid Kiwi accent. Why not just get a Maori actor - no star power? I know, plenty of actors have played characters from other backgrounds - this one urked me a little. I do love Ben Kingsley though.

The production and future technology in this film are excellent, and the story of Ender's rise from the academy cadet to leader of the resistance (no, this is not Star Wars) is interesting, if not cliched. Overall, I enjoyed this movie, and would be interested to see where the story goes in a potential sequel.

Rating:

3.5 out 5.

The Counselor Review (No Spoilers)

Every now and then, a film comes along that will divide audiences - The Counselor is definitely one of those films. You will either like this film, or hate it. If you love it, then you are definitely in a whole other group. The legend that is Ridley Scott brings together an all star cast, with a script by first time screenplay writer Cormac McCarthy. Although I am not familiar with his written work, I have seen some of his adaptations, namely No Country for Old Men and The Road, and both are good films. I preferred The Road over No Country. 

Where do I even start to tell you what I thought of it - firstly, casting. Fassbender is, as always, just cool. He is just damn cool. He is excellent as the confident Counselor, that starts to break up when the shit hits the fan. Don't worry folks, that's not a spoiler. It's in the synopsis. 

From IMDB - "A lawyer finds himself in over his head when he gets involved in drug trafficking."

The rest of the cast is all pretty good as well. Pitt, again, cool as a cucumber; Javier - another zany character for him; Penelope - nothing much to do, except look sexy, which she does well; Cameron, Diaz that is -  now this is the tough one. Cameron Diaz to some will be horribly miscast, to others she will be fine. For me, I'm a little torn. Her character is basically a femme fatale, a seductress that can't be trusted, but you'll fall for her anyways. For the most part, I think I am fine with her in the role. The thing is, I just don't find Diaz beautiful. Sure, you is alluring in this film, but there is no natural beauty to her. She looks good done up all slutty, but without that, I'm a bit meh. That's probably too critical on her in general, rather than how she played the role. 

The thing I quite enjoyed about this film is the dialogue. And let me tell you straight, this film is about dialogue. There a some minor moments of action, but it is predominantly talky. And, for the most part, it is sumputous for the ears. I could watch this again just to listen in more carefully. Aside from that, the usual Ridley production value is there - he really knows how to make a beautiful looking film. 

The story, well, it's pretty simple, but it's the way it is executed that will get most people. It just feels like the audience is left to fill in the gaps. Don't get me wrong, this is not a bad thing in movies, the audience should think about things, but, the movie is almost like watching a series of scenes that are put together to follow some sort of narrative, but it doesn't gel completely. Characters pop in here and there, but are never seen again or serve only to move the plot along to the next destination or scene. 

The first half is pretty much all talk, and then it slowly ramps up to a more intense ending, but, in some ways it needed to be bigger, or more gripping - especially after all that talk. It's good talk, but, you want the pay off, and I don't think we quite got that. I liked this movie, which I am happy to say. But, I wanted to love it, especially with the talent involved, and I just can't. I would watch it again though, some time down the track. 

In the end, without giving away the ending, what is it all about? - Simply - Greed is not good, be happy with what you have. Sure, there's more to it than that, but, it's a non spoiler review. 

Rating:

3 out of 5.

P.S. Cameron Diaz and a Windscreen - Javier's reaction - priceless.

About Time Review (No Spoilers)

Well, my previous entry talks about expectation, and sometimes having it set to high. I’ve heard very good things about About Time, and the film maker's previous credits are pretty much excellent as well. So, how does this movie stand up to it all – well, the praise is definitely deserved. Instant classic!

I love time travel films, and I’ve got a penchant for good romantic comedies. But, this is all so much more. Drama, comedy, romance, science fiction - blended perfectly. I fucking loved it.

I don’t know much about the male lead, but he was certainly very likeable. Sure, he’s a red head, but we can’t hold that against him. Female lead, Rachel McAdams – love her! Has she been in a shit film? Well, she probably has, but, because she’s in it, it’s still worth watching. Is she the go to girl for romance films? The Notebook (classic), Vow, Morning Glory…the list may go on. She’s got a wonderful on screen presence, and her chemistry with her counterpart on screen is very believable.

Chemistry – that’s really what makes this film just work. All the characters just mix so well together. Whether it is they’re falling Iove, or have a odd family bond, it’s all just so real and unreal at the same time. Real because you can relate to the emotions being presented here, and unreal because it has time travel…haha. Seriously though, this is the feel good movie you need to see. It’ s funny, heart felt, and damn good entertainment.

I fucking loved it – I know, I said that before.

Oh, and Bill Nighy, as the dad, is just superb.

Rating:

5 out of 5.

Captain Phillips Review (No Spoilers)

One problem I have with reading about and following film talk so much is that I can get caught up in expectation. That is, if a film is reviewing very well, I can expect that I will automatically love it as well. Then, what happens is that I go watch it, and only end up thinking it was good, not great. That’s how I feel about Captain Phillips. Actually, let me get this straight at least, it’s very good, but I didn’t love it.

However, when left feeling like this, I struggle with my rating. So, let’s run through the key points before rating.

Acting – excellent. Tom Hanks really is a pro. He’s a legend basically. That is saying a lot, but come on, it’s fucken Tom Hanks. He’s been around for ages, done varying roles, and, in the end, has made some pretty damn good films. He really puts in the effort to give a convincing portrayal for anything he’s in. There is a reason why he has won 2 academy awards for best actor. The supporting cast are all very good, with the actors playing the Somali pirates very convincingly.

Production – Pretty much the entire film takes place at sea, with production being on a real life container ship and other sea vessels. The production value overall is very high, which is what you would expect with this calibre of talent on and off the screen. Paul Greengrass is best known for the 2^nd and 3^rd Bourne films. He knows what he’s doing with films like this. However, don't go in expecting a Bourne film...think more United 93 instead.

Story – based on a true story, it’s a very interesting story of survival. Although you may know the ending, the series of events that unfold are quite tense. A friend of mine thought the ending played out a little too Hollywood-ish, but, that is a minor issue. I actually thought it was fine. Didn’t bother me.

Overall – The film is indeed very good. I found some of the pacing was a bit off towards the middle, and perhaps it could have been about 15 to 20 mins shorter - just to tighten it up a bit. But, it’s also hard to say where they could have cut it. There’s plenty of character development in this, so I shouldn’t really complain about length. I’m not sure I’d ever watch it again though, but, in a few years, you never know.

Rating:

4 out of 5.

Prisoners Review (No Spoilers)

The question here is - how far would you go to keep your family safe? Hugh Jackman is a man on the edge in this film, but, does he go over? That's a question each audience member will be asking themselves - is it too far? 

The first trailer for this film really didn't give much away, it seemed like a run of the mill detective/mystery thriller. However, this is 2.5 hours of a harrowing journey into the lives of families that have lost children - abducted without a trace. The central characters are portrayed by Hugh Jackman (father of one of the girls) and Jake Gyllenhaal (detective on the case). Both are pretty much brilliant. Hugh missed out on the oscar for Les Miserables, but he could very well bag it for this role. His performance is as realistic and powerful as they come. Jake is superb - taking hard edged cop to new levels. 

The supporting cast members are all great. The setting is a bleak small town, and there are no sunny days in this place. It adds to the intense atmosphere. This is a film where you really do wonder where the hell it is going. Will it be a happy ending, or an ultimately hopeless inevitability. Although i felt at times the pacing was just a bit too slow, you're never bored with what is happening. This film is like a fine tooth comb through the shittiest of situations.

It's definitely worth your time. If you like your hardcore dramas, with intense emotions of loss and despair, this is for you. Man, I'm really selling it aren't i? This is oscar worthy stuff - at least for the always great Hugh. 

Rating:

4.5 out of 5. 

Gravity Review (No Spoilers)

I had been waiting with anticipation for this film for well over a year. There was very little information about it for quite sometime, up until the recent few months when audiences were treated to some great previews. It showcased some intense scenes, and some spectacular visual effects. The final product truly delivers on both of those. 

I lost count on the amount of times my hands got sweaty - such an intense film going experience. Clooney and Bullock are pitch perfect in their roles. Director Alfonso Cuaron has constructed a science fiction / space film like no other. This is not a film about aliens, or a Star Wars or Star Trek, this movie is like watching a documentary on when the shit hits the fan in space. Utterly realistic, the visuals alone are worth the price of entry. I went and saw this at a large screen, with an awesome sound system. I'm so glad I paid my $20 to see it this way. 

It's perhaps the closest we'll ever get to seeing what planet earth looks like from space - unless you're due for a flight into the stratosphere sometime soon. It's a 90 min film, and none of that time is wasted. You're drawn into the unfolding events right from the get go. Although character development is a little bit light on, the film is ultimately about the struggle to survive, given the worst odds possible. You do feel for the main characters in their attempts to stay alive, in a place where no one can hear you scream.

If this doesn't win awards (yes, talking to you Academy) for Visual Effects and Cinematography at least, then it's a disgrace. 

Rating:

Been hovering around a 4 or 4.5 out of 5. I'll go for a 4.5, because, in the end, it takes something special to get the hands all sweaty like that.

Follow me on Facebook

If you like my blog, then you may also like to follow my facebook page. Click the link below.

Too Much To Watch 

And/or my Twitter @Chetan1979

Thanks for visiting.

Breaking Bad Series Review **Contains Spoilers**

Before you read on, just another reminder that this article contains spoilers.

Ok, if you've made it this far, you want to read this. You may not like what I have to say though. Breaking Bad is not my favourite show - hell, it wouldn't even make my top 10 list. Don't even ask me what that would be made up of though. I haven't made an actual list. 

Anyways, I started to watch this show purely because of the hype. I think I sat down to start this show about a year ago. Everyone had been going on about it, with lots of calls back then saying it is the best show on tv. And, people are still saying that. The first couple of seasons were a challenge to get through. I kept on with it because I actually really wanted to see how it all ends up. I figured it must at least get better. And, you know what, it did. But, I still didn't find it as gripping as other shows I have loved - not until the end.

Seasons 4 and 5 are by far the best. But, you have to watch it from the start to actually see the main characters descent into evil. On a whole, it really is quite amazing to see the transformation of a mild mannered chemistry teacher into a lying, murderous bastard. 

So, is the end befitting the show? Well, it is. Unlike the odd ending for Dexter, which probably didn't go the way it should have (see my previous blog entry), this ending is a damn sight more surefooted. It knows exactly what story threads it needs to tie up, and how the characters should be dealt with. I love the way he 'dealt' with his former Gray Matter colleagues. The scenes of him saying goodbye to his family are touching. We finally get to see that realisation in the character that he has lost everything and will never get it back - nothing he can say will bring the family back together. No more lies, just truth. But, the truth won't save him. It will only serve the people he leaves behind.

The final scenes in the club house are pretty cool, with a car central locking system put to great use. - say hello to his little friend. The final moments between Jessie and Walter are good. Not much said, because really, they've said all they need to say to each other plenty of times before. Walter cares for him, Jessie hates him, but is not a killer. I'm glad he didn't pull that trigger. It just wouldn't have been right for his character. And yes, in the end, Walt does die (a casualty of his own final revenge). It was a good ending, and although the show is not a favourite, it's sad to think we'll not see anymore of these characters. Breaking Bad, you won me over.

Marvel's Agents of Shield (Pilot Episode)

Marvel presents Agents of Shield. Thought I would check this out sooner rather than later. Typically I wait till there are a few more episodes before getting into shows, but, well, I just couldn't wait. So, is it worth it? Is it any good? All in all, yes, it is a pretty good start. There's nice linkages to the Marvel universe we already know (from the movies), but unfortunately there are no appearances from any of The Avengers. Remember though, this is not a tv show about The Avengers, but the focus is on the group that brought them together - S.H.I.E.L.D. 

Writer, producer and pilot director Joss Whedon is practically a god now. He's created perhaps one of the most iconic shows there is - Buffy The Vampire Slayer. His other shows are pretty damn good as well - Angel, Firefly and Dollhouse. He's the man behind the 2012 juggernaut The Avengers. That movie pretty much took the characters that had been already set up in solo films, put them together and hit it out of the park. It was a lot of fun. 

That's probably the keyword to all of Joss' television and film credits - fun. He really knows how to write some witty/funny dialogue, yet still have an underlying seriousness to it all. His engaging of the audience into these worlds and characters is amazing. This pilot episode has exactly all of that. It's funny, engaging, and sets up some interesting plot points for the upcoming episodes. I love shows that centre around characters that have extraordinary abilities, whether they be superhuman or super intelligent - or both. I'll definitely be tuning in for some more Agents of Shield.

Dexter S8 Review **Contains Spoilers**

One of my absolute favourite shows has been Dexter. Such a well written, well acted and thrilling show. Sadly, it has come to an end. I'll have to admit, this season was a little lack lustre to begin with, but became quite taunt towards to the end. In fact, the best season was probably season 4, with the great John Lithgow playing the villain. The ending to that season was astonishing to say the least - real shocking stuff. I can't really put my finger on why this season didn't feel that great. Perhaps my semi knowledge of the end being disappointing was effecting my ability to just sit back and enjoy - instead I may have over analysed everything that was happening to predict the ending.

Michael C Hall has been great as Dexter, a sort of anti-hero. He's a guy that kills people, but only bad people - people he deems not worthy to live. So, is he not a bad guy for killing them? Well, he is, but we love him for it. And perhaps that is why the ending is so wishy washy. Ultimately, he probably should have died at the end of series. He should have been exposed for what he really was, and put to rest himself. 

But, I am happy as well that he lives. However, the final sequences were just a little bit detached. It's almost like the writers didn't know how to really finish it. Like they were lost themselves, as Dexter seems to be. What were they trying to say with that ending? That he could come back? Great, he didn't die in the storm on the boat, but he's pretty much dead anyways? Maybe they could have had him hunting a new prey in this isolated town - as though he is starting again, with no one close to him that could get hurt or killed.

In the end, I have to look on the show as a whole. Each season has been enjoyable, with some better than others. I would relish the chance to see Dexter come back - even if to have another go at that ending.

The Walking Dead S3 Review

The Walking Dead is an extremely depressing show. I mean, look at it - the world has gone to shit, with danger at every turn. You couldn't take a crap without getting chewed up by some Zombie, or having your former friendly neighbour take you out. After the slow pace of season 2, this season ramps it up from the word go! There is blood and zombie deaths galore. The whole cast get in on it this time. It's been 8 months since the events of S2, so now they're hardened killers.

The first half of the season is a real blood bath. It involves Rick's crew of survivors setting up home in an abandoned Prison. There's plenty of killing to be done to make this place safe to stay. Along side that, we are introduced to a character named The Governor. He's set up a new town to keep people safe - although, all is not as it seems. The second half of season slows down the generic killing (just a tad) and pits these two and their crews against each other instead. It makes for very interesting and tense viewing.

Overall, this season is great. It improves on season 2, and that season was pretty damn good anyways. 

Pacific Rim Review (No Spoilers)

Well, I saw this film a few days ago. I didn't blog straight away, mainly due to time constraints...and laziness. 

I was quite keen to see this film. The trailers have been pretty good, and it looked to be some A grade blockbuster cinema. Now, I didn't expect it to be 'Lincoln', or any dramatic masterpiece, but, I figured I would leave the cinema having loved it. Well, that didn't happen - I left the cinema a little disappointed. 

Now, I'm not saying it was a crap film, and not worth seeing, it just didn't leave me with that , "fuck, that was awesome feeling".  I suppose, compared to the blockbusters I've seen this year and loved (Star Trek Into Darkness, Man of Steel), I was hoping that this would be the same.

So, why was I "disappointed". Heck, using that word just doesn't seem right to me either sometimes. The film itself is not disappointing. In fact, for the most part, it's a fun film, with excellent production value. The story was probably a little too simplistic. The acting from some cast members was not great, and the scripting could have been better. I'm still undecided as to whether the lead actor (Charlie Hunnam) was right for the role, or if the script made him look bad. He just didn't have the screen presence required.

I doubt there will be sequel. The box office for this film has been pretty mediocre. It looked like it should have been a home run for Guillermo Del Toro, but, I suppose the general feeling has been the same as mine - pretty much more than OK, almost a solid good, but nowhere near great.

This one has been tough to nail a rating on. I instantly felt like I doubt I would watch it again anytime soon. But, another viewing maybe required to settle on my score.

Rating:

3 out of 5. (at this point).

Man of Steel Review (No Spoilers)

Usually, each year I have up to a handful of films that I really look forward to seeing. This year, the most anticipated for me has been Man of Steel (followed by Iron Man 3). Since the announcement of a film being made, with a story by Christopher Nolan and David Goyer, the excitement levels have been slowly elevating. When I saw the first preview, I was creaming in my pants - it was epic. Today, that culminated in finally being able to see the finished product. 

Before I get into what I thought of the film, let me mention my thoughts about the choice of director. Zack Snyder, responsible for 300, Watchmen, Legend of the Guardians and Sucker Punch. I've seen all of these except Legend. 300, I have watched once entirely, and found it to be average. Sure, the visuals were impressive, but the engagement factor was quite low. I tried to watch it again once, and ended up turning it off. I want to give it another go, just to make sure, but am in no hurry. Watchmen I saw at the cinemas, and quite enjoyed it. I have the extended edition at home (yet to watch), and am looking forward to sitting down and watching that. Sucker Punch, oh my god, this was a bad movie. Great action scenes, but absolutely no story at all. Well, there was a story, but it was too basic. Anyways, overall, when it was announced that this man was to helm the Superman reboot, I was really scared about the final product. Even though C Nolan and D Goyer are involved, could Z Snyder screw the pooch? Sucker Punch style, or just make a boring film like 300?

Well, it turns out, he has delivered the goods. Man of Steel is a very enjoyable movie, and pretty much just awesome all round. Great new take on the Superman we all know. Superman from 1978 is a classic, and considered a benchmark in superhero films. This film doesn't try to follow that style, but re-envisions the character with a more serious tone. There is no comedy here. Sure, there are some funny parts, but this is dark and real. Not Batman dark though. These two characters in themselves are very different. 

Henry Cavill is an absolutely perfect piece of casting. It is really difficult to picture anyone else in this film as Superman. He hasn't taken the mantle from Christopher Reeve, but his take is excellent, and I look forward to seeing him don the suit once again. The entire cast is epic really. You've got two of cinemas greats playing the fathers - Russell Crowe as Jor-El, and Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent. I love both these actors, and they are excellent in their respective roles. If you haven't put it together, yes, both of Clark Kent's dads are Robin Hood. I was initially hesitant about Amy Adams as Lois Lane, mainly because I thought she would be too old for the part, but, she is great. Michael Shannon as General Zod - pretty menacing bad guy. 

Visuals are great. These days though, most movies like this with budgets have pretty good special effects. There's no excuse not to really. If you have a big tent pole pic, the special effects should be top class. The action is aplenty in this movie, but there are still character moments that draw you in emotionally. There's a particular scene that impacted me quite heavily, even when thinking about it afterward. I knew then, that I was really drawn into this movie and the world that's been created. 

So, how did it measure up for something I was anticipating so much? Not a let down at all. Didn't exceed, but, with a lot of mixed reviews lately, I went in a little scared at what I was about to see. I enjoyed this more than Iron Man 3, but perhaps not as much as Star Trek Into Darkness. But, the tones of those films were quite different. Bring on Man of Steel 2.

Rating:

4.5 out of 5. (Epic)

Fast & Furious 6 and After Earth

It's been a good weekend for cinema going - two visits. Been a long time since I've done that. First up, Fast & Furious 6. This series has cheese written all over it. But, it's a series of films that is also a lot of fun to watch. Fast 5 changed the format of the films by moving away from the street racing scene and instead moving the series into action heist territory, but still firmly focused on the cars. It was a good move, as it has seriously reinvigorated the series. Thankfully, the 6th instalment keeps this new take and is perhaps more exciting that the 5th. 

Minus some members of the 5th film's ensemble, we have the major players back for some more frenetic car chases and stunts, and some funny banter between the characters. There's plenty of action in cars and out of, with a few hard hitting fight scenes. Gina Carano, from Steven Soderbergh's 'Haywire', joins the cast, and has a nice little biffo with returning cast member Michelle Rodriguez. Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson is also back, and looks bigger than what he did in Fast 5. The man is beyond beef cake...he is frankly, fucking huge! He's a great addition to the cast, and I hope he sticks around for future instalments. 

And of course, we have Paul Walker and Vin Diesel. You've gotta love these two. The characters they play are perfect for them. They're well and truly solid mates now, after being on edge with each other in previous films.

Yes, the film is ridiculous. The last action scene will raise at least one obvious question - I won't say what, but if think about how long the scene is, and where it is set, the question is pretty clear. But, aside from whatever you think of these films, this is an exciting film and you must leave your brain at the door. Throw logic out the window, and just enjoy the ride.

Fast 7 is due out same time next year. A new director (James Wan - 'Saw','Insidious') is on board now though, so it will be interesting to see what he brings to the franchise. The standard of films 5 and 6 has certainly set the bar high.

Next up, a film that has been pretty much panned by most reviewers - After Earth. In some ways, I think some of the criticism is purely because of the director behind it - M . Night Shyamalan. He's the man that burst onto the film scene in 1999 with The Sixth Sense. He then did Unbreakable and Signs - both were pretty good. But, his form since has been not so good. Most reviewers have not liked films like The Happening, Lady in the Water and The Last Airbender. I have to say, I have liked them, but I doubt I would watch them again. Next to what he started out with, they're pretty mediocre. This unfortunately means that films with his name attached are more prone to being savaged. Sure, the quality of the film plays a part, but, his name plays a bigger one. Notice the lack of visibility of his name in the promotions for this film. The studio is aware of the public perception.

So, how does he fair with this film - well, it's better than his last few. It's a bit difficult to compare this film to something like The Sixth Sense or Unbreakable, as the genres are very different. Thing is, with those films, they're quite memorable, and ones you'll likely watch again. This one, although it is good, again, is probably not one you'd watch again. When I say good, it only just makes it to that status - it could be because I'm a Will Smith fan.

The film is set 1000 years after humans have abandoned Earth, because it was pretty much left uninhabitable. The situation is that humans destroyed the planet, and we left it to exist somewhere else. Will Smith and his son Jaden (playing father and son onscreen as well)  have crash landed on Earth. It's now considered a very dangerous place for humans. The story is essentially a survival tale. The special effects are good, but you know they could be better, the action scenes are ok, the acting is ok. Will Smith is not the lead here, his son is.  He's an ok actor, but has a long long way to go before he gets anyway near having the charisma and presence onscreen like his dad. Good luck to him.

There are some tense moments, but perhaps some more story elements were needed to really amp up the excitement level. Perhaps if Will Smith had some more screen time and action scenes it may have been better. It is worth watching once, but I doubt you'll take anything memorable away from it, and therefore you probably won't watch it again.

Ratings:

Fast & Furious 6 - 4 out of 5.

After Earth - 3 out of 5.

Star Trek Into Darkness

I hadn't managed to get to the cinemas for a few weeks - holidays and sickness keeping me away. I tried to go see this film on my last day in town before flying out, but just ended up doing last minute holiday prep. So, with much excitement, I finally managed to see Star Trek Into Darkness on Saturday night.

I thoroughly enjoyed the 2009 reboot of the franchise, and the trailers for this film were epic. It turned out I left the cinema highly satisfied. In fact, I could say it was better than the first. Plenty of humour and action, and a lot of heart. The cast is excellent, and they gel so well together. 

The only negatives I could say about this film is that the motivations of the villain were perhaps a little weak. In fact, I can't even remember much about the explanation of the origin of his character. I think I'll definitely have to watch it again as soon as it is out on blu ray. The ending may also be a little flat as well, but, these are minor gripes. 

All up, I was having a great time during this film. Now I'm really excited to see what director J.J. Abrams does with Star Wars - Episode 7. In fact, it would be interesting to see who they bring in for the next Star Trek film, as J.J. has made a couple of pretty outstanding films to live up to in this franchise.

Rating:

4.5 out of 5. (I was thinking 5, but I think another viewing is required first).

Alias (S1), White Collar (S4), Arrow (S1), Revenge (S2).

Recently I have taken some time off work to go on Holidays. That put a bit of a spanner in the film and tv show viewing, but, I have managed to watch some stuff. One show in particular I took away with me, and managed to finish a season of whilst away - Alias (Season 1). This is a show I had meant to watch for years. In fact, I did start it a few years ago, but it just fell by the way side. So, I got hold of it again, and made a good go of it whilst on holidays. Man, I was not disappointed. The first season was quite thrilling. The main character of Sydney Bristow, played by Jennifer Garner, is a very likeable everyday person, that happens to lead the most ridiculous double life ever. The show is completely off the wall, but is extremely well produced, with plot lines that are complex yet involving. If you're into the spy genre, then I thoroughly recommend picking this show up. Based on the first season, I don't think you'll be disappointed.

Once I got back from holidays, I fell extremely ill for a few days. Man, I  was knocked for six with an upper respiratory tract infection. Fought fever for 5 days, but did manage a couple sessions of tv show catch up. First, the missus and I finished White Collar Season 4. What a great show. The lead character played by Matt Bomer is as charismatic as they come. He really makes the show. I've tried to avoid the shows that have self contained episodes, but this is one of a select few that I really enjoy. The others I watch that are similar are The Mentalist and Person of Interest (off the top of my head). Otherwise, I really only try to invest time in shows that have one storyline for the season.

Now that most current shows are wrapping their seasons up, I am on a finish-up run. Just finished Arrow Season 1, which was great. I really enjoy the superhero genre, and this is very much like a tv show of Batman. You know, the billionaire playboy that is also a caped crusader - minus the cape in this show.

Just finished Revenge Season 2 last night. Although the second season has probably not been as interesting as Season 1, it is still a guilty pleasure of a show. There was a major reveal at the end of the season for one of the characters, one that I was hoping would happen.I won't go into here, but if you've been following the show, then the final seconds will hopefully give you that sigh of relief - because it was starting to get ridiculous.

The Following - Season One Review (No Spoilers)

I'd heard a lot about this show before starting it. I tried to hold off and finish some other shows first, but a girl at work kept going on about it, so I just had to start it. The first few episodes were really good - had that addictive quality to it. It probably dipped a little in the middle few episodes, but not much. Overall, the show is violent, bloody and really gets you on the edge of seat. It is a very effective thriller. I found it to be well written, with Kevin Bacon being fantastic in the lead role. For a guy in his mid 50's, he looks damn fit. The supporting cast are excellent as well, and the villain, played by James Purefoy, is pure evil. He's charming as hell, but twisted as fuck.

The first season is 15 episodes (each having 42min run time), so it can be quick to get through. It follows a single story throughout the season, unlike other thriller/crime solving shows like Criminal Minds (I've seen the occasional episode of that show) which follow a different case each week. There is a nice buildup to the season finale. Plenty happens along the way, and you can find it unpredictable at times - which is what you want right? 

If you're after something that is dark, bloody and involves serial killers, with a potential to haunt you in your sleep, then give this show a go. If you don't like the first episode or two, then it's probably not your cup of tea. The first season finale was a cracker, and I will definitely be back for more.

How Many Shows Is Too Many?

I haven't really blogged about television so far. I've been unsure how to tackle it - review entire seasons or just talk about the show in general. Basically, I don't want to spoil anything for anyone that is perhaps not watching it, but wants to, or if you're just not up to the seasons/episodes I am. So, what I'll start off with is a list of all the shows I have on my slate at the moment. 

Below is a list of everything I am either currently in-season on, or between seasons:

Archer, Arrow, Banshee, Boardwalk Empire, Breaking Bad, Burn Notice, Dexter, Firefly, Game of Thrones, Hart of Dixie (I watch this on and off with the miss), Homeland, In Treatment, Justified, Luther, New Girl, Nikita, Person of Interest, Revenge, Revolution, Spartacus, Strike Back, Supernatural, Teen Wolf, The Following, The Killing, The Mentalist, The Vampire Diaries, The Walking Dead, The Wire, True Blood and White Collar. 

I may have missed some, but I think that pretty much shows I have quite a few on the go. Some shows I am way behind on, but I am mostly up to date. 

A few more I want to add to the list include: Alias (never watched it, but really want to), The Transporter (yes, there is a tv series based on the films) and Hannibal.

At the moment, I seem to be doing ok with getting through them. How many do you watch? What else do you recommend?

Iron Man 3

Most reactions to the Iron Man films have been - great first film, and so so second outing. Well, I have to give equal merit to the first two, and this entry probably sits on par with those. Admittedly, I found the change of director and script style to be a little difficult to settle in on - i suppose watching both Iron Man and Iron Man 2 again just before watching part 3 had set me up for a certain feel of the films - and this third entry feels very different. 

Writer/Director Shane Black, known for his action scripts from the late 80's to mid 90's, has definitely brought his trade mark witty dialogue in this film, and shows an excellent deft at directing action. I'm tempted to describe this film as an action comedy, but that's just not quite right. It has some serious emotion flowing through it, as Tony Stark is struggling to come to terms with the events in New York in 'The Avengers' - a sort of Post Traumatic Stress I suppose. However, the comic remarks that have been ever present in the first two films seem amplified in this one. This reminded me of watching 'The Last Boyscout', which is a classic action film of the early 90's that Shane Black wrote. It's full of one liners and witty comebacks, while being laced with some classic action.

What I've really enjoyed about these films is the tech toys and limitless potential Tony Stark has in creating them. He's essentially Marvel's version of Bruce Wayne right? A human with billions of dollars at his disposal that seeks the means to fight injustice? well, maybe not, but they're both rich dudes that are superheroes. The tech just keeps getting better with each film - and man, I so want Jarvis as my home computer.

Robert Downey Jr is Tony Stark, and is great to watch in this role - it's impossible to picture anyone else playing it. On his 4th outing as Tony Stark/Iron Man, he is not ever boring, with plenty of character development taking place in this installment. I love Gwyneth Paltrow as Pepper Potts. She's got a bit more to do in this film, including flexing her fit-ass body in some actions scenes - yeah, I like Gwyneth. 

Some reviews I've read about Ben Kingsley as The Mandarin are that he will be remembered for this role - and they're not wrong there. Nothing more to say on that. Go watch and you'll see why. 

Overall, even though I felt the change of style a bit jarring to start off with, I really enjoyed the film. Marvel have kept the quality coming (The Avengers being the pinnacle), and it's definitely worthy of big screen viewing. It's these kinds of films you go to the cinemas for - lots of action, great special effects, humour, emotional depth.

Rating:

4 out of 5.